<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Day, Another DoS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/</link>
	<description>Technology, Hosting, Software, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeDVB</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeDVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 06:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Technically it wouldn&#039;t count against the uptime as it&#039;s not something within our control (just as an act of god would not be) and due to the fact that the server was online and the network was online it was simply overwhelmed.  I did give some credits to a few that were particularly upset but it seems the only customers that get upset are the ones that aren&#039;t paying much.  99.999% of our client base understands that this hurts us just as much if not more than them and that we keep things online as much as possible.

I believe the excellent communication during the incidents helped keep our clients happy as they knew what was going on and what was being done about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically it wouldn&#8217;t count against the uptime as it&#8217;s not something within our control (just as an act of god would not be) and due to the fact that the server was online and the network was online it was simply overwhelmed.  I did give some credits to a few that were particularly upset but it seems the only customers that get upset are the ones that aren&#8217;t paying much.  99.999% of our client base understands that this hurts us just as much if not more than them and that we keep things online as much as possible.</p>
<p>I believe the excellent communication during the incidents helped keep our clients happy as they knew what was going on and what was being done about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex/Depeche</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex/Depeche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-23</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s horrible. 


With all that downtime does that count onto your 99.9% up time? Does it lower because of DDos or does it not count for a DDos attack?

Good luck on future DDos attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s horrible. </p>
<p>With all that downtime does that count onto your 99.9% up time? Does it lower because of DDos or does it not count for a DDos attack?</p>
<p>Good luck on future DDos attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeDVB</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeDVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-20</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-19&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Blind Bandit &lt;/a&gt; 
Yeah, a bad couple of weeks indeed.  This is 2 DDoS attacks in the period of a week and a half - to two different servers in our network.

One of the attacks was easily filtered where as the other caused about 8 hours of intermittent downtime as the attack was HUGE and the attacker appeared to be actively monitoring it to counter our counter-measures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-19" rel="nofollow">@Blind Bandit </a><br />
Yeah, a bad couple of weeks indeed.  This is 2 DDoS attacks in the period of a week and a half &#8211; to two different servers in our network.</p>
<p>One of the attacks was easily filtered where as the other caused about 8 hours of intermittent downtime as the attack was HUGE and the attacker appeared to be actively monitoring it to counter our counter-measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blind Bandit</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Blind Bandit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-19</guid>
		<description>This sucks.  Bad couple of weeks for web hosting.  They don&#039;t seem to be letting up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sucks.  Bad couple of weeks for web hosting.  They don&#8217;t seem to be letting up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeDVB</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeDVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-17&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Amy &lt;/a&gt; 
Most DDoS attacks are compromised systems that are part of a bot network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-17" rel="nofollow">@Amy </a><br />
Most DDoS attacks are compromised systems that are part of a bot network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Ya and I think that has probably happened. I mean compromised computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya and I think that has probably happened. I mean compromised computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeDVB</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeDVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-15&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Amy &lt;/a&gt; 
The problem with that is, if the source is 1,000 computers that have been compromised and turned into bots... It&#039;s not going to do you any good to bounce the traffic back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-15" rel="nofollow">@Amy </a><br />
The problem with that is, if the source is 1,000 computers that have been compromised and turned into bots&#8230; It&#8217;s not going to do you any good to bounce the traffic back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-15</guid>
		<description>You do have a point there. I remember him saying some thing about being able to point the traffic back at the computer or network sending it in order to take the sender down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do have a point there. I remember him saying some thing about being able to point the traffic back at the computer or network sending it in order to take the sender down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeDVB</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeDVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-14</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-13&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-13&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amy&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A local web host here has some thing called watch guard, I am friends with the system admin and he says it works great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m not familiar with it but the issue is that if your entire network is say 1gbps and you get a 2gbps attack it doesn&#039;t matter how well your hardware or software can filter the attack because the pipe to your network is going to be flooded before it&#039;s filtered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-13"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-13" rel="nofollow">Amy</a> :</strong></p>
<p>A local web host here has some thing called watch guard, I am friends with the system admin and he says it works great.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with it but the issue is that if your entire network is say 1gbps and you get a 2gbps attack it doesn&#8217;t matter how well your hardware or software can filter the attack because the pipe to your network is going to be flooded before it&#8217;s filtered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.mikedvb.com/2009/07/26/another-day-another-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 19:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mikedvb.com/?p=57#comment-13</guid>
		<description>A local web host here has some thing called watch guard, I am friends with the system admin and he says it works great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A local web host here has some thing called watch guard, I am friends with the system admin and he says it works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
